Australian judgments. Evidence-backed context.

Australian judgments, with the source in sight.

Explore Australian judgments and the outcomes behind them.

Book a demo Sign in

Australian judgments · Source-linked research · Personal collections

FCACthPublic decision · example16 Oct 2026Puah v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship[2026] FCA 1511

Commonwealth · collected decisions

Commonwealth collection share · not a success rate.

39%74,548 of 193,354 decisions

Collected decisions Decisions behind the figure Source-linked research

Figures as at 17 October 2026, from decisions we have collected.

Snapshot scope and calculation · Official judgment: [2026] FCA 1511

193,354 collected decisions 9 Australian jurisdictions 59,191 Federal Court (FCA) decisions 16 Oct 2026 public example decision

Figures as at 17 October 2026, from decisions we have collected.

From question to client advice in three steps

Find comparable cases

Search by legal terms, phrase or citation, or browse until you find the decisions you need.

Search by terms, phrase or citation
Browse available judgments
Keep the publisher link in view

See how they were decided

Read the reasons and see the outcomes in the collected decisions behind a figure.

Counts with their denominators
Small samples held back
Read the decisions behind a figure

Put it in your advice

Bring passages, citations and your own notes into a draft, ready for your review.

Save passages with their text version
Keep your notes beside the source
Copy, share, print or export TXT and JSON

Research. Matters. Perspective.

Everything you check in a week of litigation, in one place

Find the decisions, organise the matters you track, and keep the evidence behind each figure close at hand.

Tab 1

Search

Search the way you research: by legal terms, a phrase or a citation. Then read the decision behind the result.

Official sources for these illustrated examples: [2026] FCA 1511, [2026] FCA 1514, [2026] FCA 1522.

Terms, phrase and citation search
Browse available judgments
Court links where supplied
Save passages for your draft

Tab 2

My Matters

The matters you choose to track, with public decisions and their recorded dates kept together.

Matters are user-entered
Keep a court reference with the matter
Record the dates you need
Return to the source decision

Tab 3

Legal Intelligence

See the shape of the decisions we have collected, with the source and scope behind every figure.

Court-by-court collection counts
Classified outcome figures where available
Evidence behind the example cohort
Coverage varies by court

Figures as at 17 October 2026, from decisions we have collected.

Explore a jurisdiction · Figures as at 17 October 2026, from decisions we have collected.

Made for Australian legal research

Built for the way Australian courts work

From Commonwealth courts to the states and territories: explore the judgments we have collected, with their court references and source links.

CommonwealthFCA 59,191 · HCA 6,654 · FCAFC 5,384 · ACompT 167 · ACopyT 85 · IRCA 34
New South WalesNSWSC 42,013 · NSWLEC 18,672 · NSWCA 13,771 · NSWDC 9,739 · NSWCCA 9,435 · NSWIRComm 5,842
VictoriaVSC 233 · VSCA 100
QueenslandQCAT 89 · QIRC 49 · QCA 36 · QSC 32 · QDC 28 · QCATA 22
Western AustraliaWASC 56 · WASCA 12
South AustraliaSASCA 47 · SASC 39 · SADC 25
TasmaniaTASSC 53 · TASFC 13 · TASCCA 4
ACT & Northern TerritoryACTSC 122 · ACTMC 99 · NTSC 67 · ACTCD 32 · ACTCA 9 · ACTCC 8

Coverage varies by court. Check the current coverage before relying on an empty search.

Built for how lawyers work

Find comparable decisions

Search by legal terms, phrase or citation, with court links where supplied.

Outcome context

See the classified decisions and denominator behind the example figure.

Your matters, organised

Keep the references and dates for the matters you choose to track.

Research ready to review

Bring saved passages and notes into a draft for your review.

Keep sources together

Keep useful passages with their exact collected text version.

Return to the judgment

Check the source, quotations and later treatment before giving advice.

My Matters

The dates that matter, kept in view

Keep a matter’s court reference, public decisions and recorded dates together, so you can return to the source when you need it.

Official source for the illustrated decision and date: [2026] FCA 1511. About this dated snapshot.

Your mattersAdd the matters you choose to track.

Public decisionsKeep the judgment beside its citation.

Recorded datesUse dates recorded in the public decision.

Source referencesOpen the publisher’s judgment to check the detail.

Figures as at 17 October 2026, from decisions we have collected.

Numbers you can defend

This Commonwealth collection share starts with the decisions behind it: what was counted, and what the number can tell you.

39% Commonwealth collection share · not a success rate. Read the snapshot scope and calculation.

Source-linkedRead the decisions behind the example.
Small samples held backThe reporting rules come from the producer.
Dated figuresSee when the figures were collected.
Your judgementCheck the source before giving advice.

Figures as at 17 October 2026, from decisions we have collected.

Who it’s for

Litigators in firms

Find comparable decisions and keep useful passages with their sources.

Barristers

Check comparable decisions before a conference, with the court text in view.

In-house legal teams

Bring research together for review, with citations and your own notes.

Questions lawyers ask us

The short answers. There’s more detail in the help centre and our methodology.

Still have a question?

Explore the workflow with public decisions in your area of law.

Book a demo Help centre

Is this legal advice?

No. These figures describe collected decisions, not the result of your next case. You decide what they mean for your client.

Where does the data come from?

Collected public judgments from supported court sources and the Open Australian Legal Corpus. Coverage varies by court.

How are the figures checked?

The outcome producer counts eligible, source-bound classifications. The methodology explains the denominator and when a rate is withheld.

Do you rate or profile judges?

Published-name profiles are not rankings or predictions. Check the decisions and source material for yourself.

Can I track a matter?

Matters are user-entered. The example above uses real public decisions and their recorded decision dates.

How can I use my research?

Save passages with your notes, then copy, share, print or export a draft as TXT or JSON.

Plans for firms of every size

Talk to us about access for your practice or team.

Practitioner

For sole practitioners and barristers.

Firm

For legal teams exploring shared research needs.

Enterprise

For organisations with broader research needs.

See it in your area of law

A walkthrough using public decisions and the courts you work with.

Book a demo